Don’t take regular fish oil capsules to prevent heart disease
Original: eternity4719 · source details
Original author: eternity4719 · Chinese source: · English adaptation: parveen0029. Translation and grade notes ↗
Bibliographic titles are retained in their original language.
Source author's views and grades; not individually verified by this site.
Cost and benefit at a glance
- Check the cost Cost ↓
- It costs roughly 1 to 3 yuan per day, or 400 to 1000 yuan per year. Taking it requires no extra time at all.
- Then the source benefit Benefit ↓
- The VITAL trial included 25871 participants who took 1 gram of fish oil daily for a median follow-up of 5.3 years. No difference emerged between groups in terms of major cardiovasc…
In plain terms
Two large trials enrolled 26000 and 15000 people with diabetes respectively. For those who took 1 gram of fish oil daily, the rates of major cardiovascular events and death were identical to those who did not take it. The fact that eating fish is beneficial does not mean fish oil capsules are equally helpful. Skipping them saves you 400 to 1000 yuan each year.
This guide's cartoon · show illustration
Enlarge illustrationOriginal illustration with Chinese lettering; the English dialogue is below. Humour is a reading aid, not evidence.
English dialogue
- Everybody loves it!
- I'd like to read the original.
Cost: what it takes
It costs roughly 1 to 3 yuan per day, or 400 to 1000 yuan per year. Taking it requires no extra time at all.
Benefit: what the source reports
The VITAL trial included 25871 participants who took 1 gram of fish oil daily for a median follow-up of 5.3 years. No difference emerged between groups in terms of major cardiovascular events or death. The hazard ratio for major cardiovascular events was 0.92 (a hazard ratio of 1 indicates no difference); its 95% confidence interval of 0.80–1.06 also confirms no meaningful difference. The hazard ratio for all-cause death was 1.02 (0.90–1.15). The ASCEND trial involved 15480 diabetic patients who took the same daily dose for an average of 7.4 years, and again no significant differences were observed: the relative risk for serious vascular events was 0.97 (0.87–1.08) and for all-cause death it was 0.95 (0.86–1.05). The perception that fish oil is worthwhile stems from many people mistakenly equating the health benefits of eating fish with those of fish oil capsules.
Conditions, limits and disagreements
Controversy: One trial did produce positive results. The REDUCE-IT trial enrolled 8179 participants with existing cardiovascular disease or diabetes, who were already taking statins and had elevated triglyceride levels (135–499 mg/dL). They took 4 grams of prescription-grade pure EPA daily, which lowered their risk of adverse events to 17.2% from 22.0%. This represents roughly a quarter reduction in risk (hazard ratio 0.75, 0.68–0.83). However, this was a high-dose prescription medication given to high-risk patients, not ordinary over-the-counter fish oil supplements. Eating fish itself is not covered by these findings.
Original references
Original bibliographic titles and links are preserved; some titles are in Chinese.
Manson JE et al. (2019). Marine n-3 Fatty Acids and Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer. NEJM. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1811403；ASCEND Study Collaborative Group (2018). Effects of n-3 Fatty Acid Supplements in Diabetes Mellitus. NEJM. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1804989；Bhatt DL 等 (2019). Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl for Hypertriglyceridemia. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1812792（备注里那项高纯度处方鱼油试验）
Medical, legal, financial and policy conditions vary by person, place and time. Policy material primarily concerns mainland China; check the cited document and current local requirements.