Don’t treat highlighting, rereading, and summarizing as primary study methods
Original: eternity4719 · source details
Original author: eternity4719 · Chinese source: · English adaptation: parveen0029. Translation and grade notes ↗
Bibliographic titles are retained in their original language.
Source author's views and grades; not individually verified by this site.
Cost and benefit at a glance
- Check the cost Cost ↓
- No cost at all; actually saves time. These methods are easy to apply and give you that “I’m studying” feeling.
- Then the source benefit Benefit ↓
- This review evaluates ten common study methods based on how well their effectiveness holds across different learning contexts, student traits, materials, and assessment formats. Th…
In plain terms
Highlighting and rereading are the most common study habits among students, yet both rank at the very bottom among ten widely used learning strategies. Summarizing, keyword memorization, and visualizing text with images also fall into the lowest tier. They’re not completely useless, but only work under very specific conditions, so spending the same amount of time on self-testing yields far better results.
This guide's cartoon · show illustration
Enlarge illustrationOriginal illustration with Chinese lettering; the English dialogue is below. Humour is a reading aid, not evidence.
English dialogue
- Can I just pay to learn it?
- Show me the practice.
Cost: what it takes
No cost at all; actually saves time. These methods are easy to apply and give you that “I’m studying” feeling.
Benefit: what the source reports
This review evaluates ten common study methods based on how well their effectiveness holds across different learning contexts, student traits, materials, and assessment formats. The highest-rated strategies are practice testing and spaced practice. Methods rated as moderately effective include elaborative questioning, self-explanation, and interleaved practice. The five least effective methods are summarizing, highlighting (or underlining), keyword memorization, visualizing text with images, and rereading. The review also notes that while most students report using rereading and highlighting, these methods do not reliably improve academic performance; they should be replaced with other approaches such as practice testing instead of rereading.
Conditions, limits and disagreements
You can use highlighting to mark sections you plan to self-test later, but the problem arises when highlighting itself is mistaken for actual learning. The review also clarifies that being in the lowest tier does not mean these methods have zero value — they simply work only under narrow circumstances and require further research. For alternative study actions, see item 14 (self-testing after closing the book) and item 15 (spreading study time across multiple days).
Original references
Original bibliographic titles and links are preserved; some titles are in Chinese.
Dunlosky J, Rawson KA, Marsh EJ, Nathan MJ, Willingham DT (2013). Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
Medical, legal, financial and policy conditions vary by person, place and time. Policy material primarily concerns mainland China; check the cited document and current local requirements.