High-Value Life GuideLife's expensive mistakes
中文

Policy, legal and insurance guides primarily concern mainland China. Scope and sources ↗

Back to the life guide

Getting to know more people rather than fixating on just one: You can’t predict compatibility before meeting someone

Original: eternity4719 · source details

Original author: eternity4719 · Chinese source: · English adaptation: parveen0029. Translation and grade notes ↗

Bibliographic titles are retained in their original language.

Source author's views and grades; not individually verified by this site.

Cost and benefit at a glance
Check the cost Cost ↓
No cost at all. Spend time getting to know several people instead of obsessing over just one. The hard part is resisting the urge to fixate on a single person.
Then the source benefit Benefit ↓
In both speed-dating studies, participants completed more than 100 self-report questionnaires related to partner preferences prior to meeting potential matches. Researchers then ap…

In plain terms

Two speed-dating studies asked participants to fill out over 100 questionnaires about their preferences in a partner before any meetings took place. These questionnaires could only reveal how likely someone is to like others in general, and how popular they tend to be — they couldn’t predict whether two specific people would hit it off. Compatibility can only be determined by meeting in person. Therefore, it’s far more worthwhile to get to know multiple people than to bet everything on just one.

This guide's cartoon · show illustration
Chapter 10 editorial cartoon: The relationship hasn't started. Your script already has a finale. Enlarge illustration
The relationship hasn't started. Your script already has a finale.

Zoom in, then swipe to move around the picture.

Loading full-size illustration…

Editorial cartoon · Chapter 10The relationship hasn't started. Your script already has a finale.

Original illustration with Chinese lettering; the English dialogue is below. Humour is a reading aid, not evidence.

English dialogue
  • What does that signal mean?
  • Try having a conversation.

Cost: what it takes

No cost at all. Spend time getting to know several people instead of obsessing over just one. The hard part is resisting the urge to fixate on a single person.

Benefit: what the source reports

In both speed-dating studies, participants completed more than 100 self-report questionnaires related to partner preferences prior to meeting potential matches. Researchers then applied a random forest model — an algorithm designed to detect patterns — to analyze the data. This model could predict “how likely an individual is to like others overall,” with the questionnaires accounting for 4%–18% of the variance in such tendencies; this represents only a small fraction of the total differences between individuals. It could also predict “how popular an individual tends to be,” explaining 7%–27% of variance. However, it completely failed to predict whether two specific individuals would be compatible; no combination of pre-meeting traits or preferences could be used to forecast their mutual attraction. Earlier, the same research team conducted another speed-dating experiment where participants reported their own ideal preferences — whether they valued physical appearance or financial prospects more. Even this information couldn’t predict how interested they’d be in a particular person during the actual date.

Conditions, limits and disagreements

Both studies clearly state that compatibility cannot be predicted before meeting someone — they do not claim that all efforts to predict it are futile. Since true compatibility can only be determined by face-to-face interaction, it makes far more sense to invest time in meeting multiple people individually rather than placing all hopes on just one. Keep in mind that all study participants were university students from Western countries; China’s dating environment differs significantly, so these findings should be applied with some caution.

Original references

Original bibliographic titles and links are preserved; some titles are in Chinese.

Joel S, Eastwick PW, Finkel EJ (2017). Is romantic desire predictable? Machine learning applied to initial romantic attraction. Psychological Science, 28(10), 1478-1489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617714580;Eastwick PW, Finkel EJ (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 245-264. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.245

Medical, legal, financial and policy conditions vary by person, place and time. Policy material primarily concerns mainland China; check the cited document and current local requirements.